Login

 

Forgot password?
Vote
Is there any connection between Russian Navy's development rates and Olympic results?
 Yes
 No
History of votings
piracy submarines Northern Fleet Black Sea Fleet Russian Navy Pacific Fleet Sevmash India shipbuilding Ukraine Bulava Neustrashimy Baltic Fleet Somalia Zvezdochka France procurements Admiral Gorshkov hijacking Arctic Arctic Sea contracts trials incident Sevastopol shipyards anti-piracy Nerpa Admiral Kuznetsov NATO Gulf of Aden search and rescue Faina coast guard exercise history Crimea Yury Dolgoruky visits Kamchatka crime hostages frigate missiles Georgia accident Russia Mistral Far East Russia-Venezuela developments US Navy Indian Navy drills Medvedev fishery Somali MiG Admiral Chabanenko aircraft carrier shipwreck Abkhazia Atalanta investigations aircraft icebreakers Japan naval science naval aviation aviation Vikramaditya presence Dmitry Donskoy Varyag war in Ossetia Mediterranean air disaster weapon Russia - India tankers overhaul Greece nuclear subs conflict Sicily Sobol Admiral Tributs The Baltic Sea Fleet Admiral Vinogradov defense order Vysotsky shipbuilding factory St. Petersburg escort Zapad-2009 Severnaya Verf utilization The Pacific Fleet marines researches admirals Kilo class export North Korea South Korea Admiralteyskie Verfi China Vladivostok Borei USA provocation strategy Putin innovations BrahMos Italy The Black Sea corvettes Novorossiysk Lada Yantar Sakhalin Yushchenko Caspian Flotilla Yanukovich reforms destroyers Chinese Navy Germany Caesar Kunikov Admiral Nakhimov Black Sea Norway Sebastopol industry French Navy Akula Vietnam FRUKUS ransom Tu-142 victories Pyotr Veliky helicopters Baltic Sea aircraft carriers Indonesia Estonia fire utilisation

 

Search
New publications new Reportedly, the Mistral deal has been 'basically' done, although continues to evoke contradictory reactions both in Russia and in NATO. Military analyst Viktor Litovkin comments the situation.
new Director of Harvard Black Sea Security Program Sergei Konoplev denies expert opinion that "Black Sea is the U.S. sea".
Publications history
What articles do you want to read?
Our friends russian navy weapons world sailing ships
 
Tell a friend Print version

Stray monsters at sea

V. Valkov, RusNavy.com editor
18.02.2009

Two nuclear submarines collided deep in the Atlantic at the beginning of February: the Royal Navy’s HMS Vanguard and the French Le Triomphant. The two ships are nuclear submarines, and both are armed with nuclear warheads. Each has a water displacement of approximately 15,000 tonnes and a length of 150 meters. They are real underwater monsters: It is no coincidence that from time to time whales surreptitiously approach them and hide under their keel, trying to “talk.”

The collision of two subs under water is a rare occurrence, since modern submarines are fitted with the most advanced equipment allowing them to “see” and “hear,” to “talk” and “be heard.” The ships had on board very experienced crews and were carrying real patrolling, not war exercises, and they were located at substantial distances from their bases (Le Triomphant needed three days to return to its base near the French city of Brest). It was a miracle that the incident did not result in serious damage and that none of the more than 200 British and French sailors died.

So what caused the collision? The defense ministries of the two countries have cited as the main reason behind the collision the “exclusively perfect noise reduction technology of the two ships,” which allowed them to become “invisible” to one another. But, wait a minute.

Invisibility is a required an essential battle characteristic of any submarine, and this characteristic is really not that absolute in these two ships to the point where they would be incapable of noticing each other.

The not-so-well-trained crew? That is possible. The British Telegraph, citing a senior naval officer, wrote: “The culture of the submarine service is at a critical level, and the leadership of the Royal Navy needs to understand that. The satiation is unlikely to be fixed quickly,” quoting comments made by an anonymous source.

Hydrology conditions in the zone of the incident could also have played a role. It is possible that the noise generated by surface targets -- fishing trawlers, passenger liners, and cargo ships -- confused the instruments aboard the submarines: that is possible.

Nonetheless, in my opinion, the main reason behind the incident is to be found somewhere else: the two ships (NATO members) were conducting their patrols on cross courses without the slightest knowledge about it! We understand that it was not for the sake of testing each other’s capabilities or increasing their combat potential that two submarines, whose weapons, by the way, are trained in one (I assume and guess in which) direction, stumbled into one another in the Atlantic absolutely by chance.

This means that members of the alliance are not sharing situation maps, and are hiding secrets from each other.

Hence the stray monsters are sailing the oceans. Only whales consider them their own.