Login

 

Forgot password?
Vote
Is there any connection between Russian Navy's development rates and Olympic results?
 Yes
 No
History of votings
piracy submarines Northern Fleet Black Sea Fleet Russian Navy Pacific Fleet Sevmash India shipbuilding Ukraine Bulava Neustrashimy Baltic Fleet Somalia Zvezdochka France procurements Admiral Gorshkov hijacking Arctic Arctic Sea contracts trials incident Sevastopol shipyards anti-piracy Nerpa Admiral Kuznetsov NATO Gulf of Aden search and rescue Faina coast guard exercise history Crimea Yury Dolgoruky visits Kamchatka crime hostages frigate missiles Georgia accident Russia Mistral Far East Russia-Venezuela developments US Navy Indian Navy drills Medvedev fishery Somali MiG Admiral Chabanenko aircraft carrier shipwreck Abkhazia Atalanta investigations aircraft icebreakers Japan naval science naval aviation aviation Vikramaditya presence Dmitry Donskoy Varyag war in Ossetia Mediterranean air disaster weapon Russia - India tankers overhaul Greece nuclear subs conflict Sicily Sobol Admiral Tributs The Baltic Sea Fleet Admiral Vinogradov defense order Vysotsky shipbuilding factory St. Petersburg escort Zapad-2009 Severnaya Verf utilization The Pacific Fleet marines researches admirals Kilo class export North Korea South Korea Admiralteyskie Verfi China Vladivostok Borei USA provocation strategy Putin innovations BrahMos Italy The Black Sea corvettes Novorossiysk Lada Yantar Sakhalin Yushchenko Caspian Flotilla Yanukovich reforms destroyers Chinese Navy Germany Caesar Kunikov Admiral Nakhimov Black Sea Norway Sebastopol industry French Navy Akula Vietnam FRUKUS ransom Tu-142 victories Pyotr Veliky helicopters Baltic Sea aircraft carriers Indonesia Estonia fire utilisation
Subscription

Modify subscription

 

Search
Strategy strategyStructure of the Navy, in-service ships, chronology.
strategyForeign navies: Uzbek Navy: past, present and future.
New publications new Reportedly, the Mistral deal has been 'basically' done, although continues to evoke contradictory reactions both in Russia and in NATO. Military analyst Viktor Litovkin comments the situation.
new Director of Harvard Black Sea Security Program Sergei Konoplev denies expert opinion that "Black Sea is the U.S. sea".
Publications history
What articles do you want to read?
Our friends russian navy weapons world sailing ships
 
Tell a friend Print version

Home / Russia / The National Security Strategy / Foreign Navies

INS Arihant. Nuclear Navy

Author: Dr. Vijay Sakhuja

The 6000 ton INS Arihant (Destroyer of Enemies) entered its home of sea water after the customary Indian prayers had been performed and the traditional coconut broken on the hull.

This indigenously built nuclear-powered submarine codenamed Advanced Technology Vessel (ATV) had been shrouded in secrecy for over a decade and was for the first time put to public view during its launch ceremony in Vishakhapatnam on July 26, 2009 to serve the Indian Navy over the next forty years.

Speaking at the launch ceremony, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh stated that India did not have "any aggressive designs" and "an external environment in our region and beyond that is conducive to our peaceful development and the protection of our value systems" was critical. Significantly, INS Arihant, with its armory of a dozen 700 km range Sagarika missiles, completes India's nuclear triad and in that context Indian Defence Minister AK Antony observed that INS Arihant supports India's "no first use" nuclear weapons policy. India plans to construct two more such platforms but the missile to be fitted on the new vessels is still not known. While INS Arihant has been built with Russian technological assistance, it is a technology demonstrator for India since such platforms require special materials and techniques for the construction of the hull and the nuclear power plant.

Reacting to the launch of INS Arihant, the Pakistani naval spokesperson has observed that the nuclear-powered submarine is a 'destabilising step' and that it could trigger an 'arms race'. He further noted that the government of Pakistan has to decide on the development of a nuclear submarine. In the past, Pakistani naval leadership has often argued that Pakistan being a nuclear power, must possess different means of delivery and a submarine offers the most credible delivery system. Pakistan began planning for a nuclear submarine soon after India acquired on lease INS Chakra in 1988. It was observed that the acquisition of nuclear submarines by India had exposed the vulnerability of Pakistan’s sea flank. Pakistan approached Canada for a conventional nuclear hybrid submarine and by 1990 Islamabad made enquiry at several other sources including China to buy nuclear submarines. Pakistan even had plans to train about two hundred personnel for the proposed submarine.

In May 1999, the Pakistan Navy was assigned a 'nuclear role' and the 'Strategic Directorate' was constituted at the Naval Headquarters. Reportedly, the Chairman of Nuclear Planning Commission (NPC) inaugurated KPC-3, a nuclear submarine project at Peshawar in 2001. Soon thereafter, Pakistan Navy announced that it was thinking of equipping its submarines with nuclear missiles for defensive purposes and that the French origin Agosta 90B submarines with air independent propulsion (AIP) system could deliver nuclear weapons.